$58 Million In Gear, $23 Million in Savings
Spend 50 Bucks - Get Free Shipping - Limited Time Only

Close This Window
Norrøna Narvik Gore-Tex Comfort Shell Jacket - Men's
32% OFF Retail: $498.95 - $568.95
$341.37 - $398.27
Close This Window

Please choose an option to order this item.

Caviar, S (341.37)
Caviar, M (398.27)
Flame Red, L (349.27)
Caviar, L (398.27)
Teak, XL (349.27)
Caviar, XL (341.37)
Teak, S (349.27)
Flame Red, S (349.27)
Teak, XXL (349.27)
Flame Red, XL (349.27)
Teak, M (349.27)
Flame Red, XXL (349.27)
Teak, L (349.27)
Flame Red, M (349.27)
Quantity:
194 in Stock – Ships Immediately & Free
  • Email this to a Friend

Norrøna Narvik Gore-Tex Comfort Shell Jacket - Men's

Item # NRA0041

The Norrøna Men's Narvik Gore-Tex Comfort Shell Jacket brings the soft, supple protection of Gore-Tex Soft Shell to every side of the mountain. This stretchy, waterproof and breathable shell not only protects you from Momma Nature's worst weather, it also lets you posthole up a ridge without overheating. Chest vent zips dump heat on the hike up, and Norrøna's zip interface seals out the snow on a powder day when combined with Norrøna pants. Gore-Tex Micro Tape saves weight and bulk, and a brushed interior keeps the cold outside from conducting through to your skin.

  • Backcountry.com is the exclusive US distributor for Norrona products

Bottom Line:

Narvik is Norwegian for 'badass ski jacket' (we made that up).

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.

I'm trying to decide between a "small" or a "medium".

I'm trying to decide between a "small" or a "medium". I'm 5'9", 155lbs, with a 31" waist. I usually wear a "small" in Arcteryx shells. Any advice?

By:
February 13, 2010

Nailed It? (0) (0)

Flag

Definitely small. I'm 5'10" 160lbs and i'd get a small.

By:
February 18, 2010

Nailed It? (1) (0)

Flag

Stick to small they have a similar fit....

By:
February 13, 2010

Nailed It? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

First Impressions...

By:
January 15, 2010

I was looking for something to replace the two jacket setup of Arcteryx (aka Deadbird) Sigma AR (softshell) and my Arcteryx Theta AR (hardshell). I love the Sigma: lightweight, totally windproof, low profile, warm but ventable. Only drawback was no hood... and it's getting beat. The Theta AR, which is about 3-4 seasons old, has been great and can handle ANY storm but it's more of the hard-shell style gore-tex which a) tends to overheat a little and b) is just a little too stiff compared to the softer materials that are available today. I was looking for something to split the gap: a softer soft-shell like jacket, yet still somewhat technical. This jacket looks like it might fit the bill. I just got the Narvik in the mail, so no real- world feeback yet, but I can give a couple first impressions.

Materials: First, the gore-tex softshell outer material looks like it definitely lands right in the middle of soft-shell and more technical hard-shell. Soft enough to be comfortable and more pliable but very likely still bomber enough for the toughest storm day. It's got the thin, soft brushed liner similar to the Sigma AR, and looks like it will provide the perfect weight when paired with a Patagonia R1 flash (cooler days) or Patagonia Cap 3 (warmer days).

Sizing: I'm 6'0, slender athletic build 170lbs and I got the Medium. This looks to fit very similar to the Theta AR, only slightly smaller. It is slightly shorter in length than the Theta, but is still "hip-length" in that it goes below the waist. The arms are LONG. Thankfully not too long and they are relatively slim so they don't feel too cumbersome and can be pulled slightly up the arm without issue. The asymmetrical cuffs might get a little annoying as they extend to cover the top 2/3 of my hand. We'll have to see how these feel over the course of a couple days. The wrist gaiters will be great on a powder day but frankly it's a feature I could do without. Not a show-stopper, they are very lightweight stretchy spandex can easily be worn on the wrists (not over thumbs) or just cut off the jacket. I would say the torso fits slightly smaller than the Theta, which is an improvement for me as there was too much excess girth/material on the Medium Theta, particularly when wearing a pack.

Pockets/zippers: I like the concept of the chest vents and I'm sure they will work well for cooling as opposed to pit zips. The only other thing that might be an issues is the hand pockets being almost down on your hips. It seems like these will be right underneath the hip belt when wearing a pack, which could be an annoyance so we'll have to see... In a perfect world I would like one more goggle/sunglass pocket. The one internal chest pocket is nice, but it's iPod/wallet/cell sized and frankly I would like another outside chest pocket or another internal goggle pocket or something.

Styling: I really like the low-key styling on this jacket compared to the other Norrona jackets. I really dig the bright royal blue color and black zips, as well as the suttle logos. Collar is nice and high for wind protection and hood seems awesome as well. Overall I am very pleased with the styling and happy to be wearing something unique and a little different than what is now the super-mainstream Deadbird.

Cost: Ridiculously high. But let's face it, not much higher than Deadbird and if you are a gear-whore like me you will pay for quality.

Final Verdict: Looking good, but need some days on the mountain before I will know for sure. For now, 8 out of 10.

Nailed It? (0) (0)

Flag

Norrona vs. Arc'teryx who wins?

Norrona vs. Arc'teryx who wins?

By:
January 23, 2010

Nailed It? (0) (0)

Flag

How was Paris?

By:
February 21, 2010

Nailed It? (0) (0)

Flag

NORRONA all the way

By: Departmentofgoods.com Employee
January 30, 2010

Nailed It? (4) (2)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Athletic fit

By:
February 20, 2009

I didn't think the fit was small. Fit is similar to Arc'teryx Alpha, except Narvik sleeves slightly longer and Alpha chest slightly wider, otherwise sizes comparable. Length is shortish on both, if you're tall, but that can be good depending on use and preference. If you like trim athletic fit, you may not want to size up. I ordered L and XL to compare, I like L. I'm 6'3" 190lbs.

Nailed It? (3) (0)

Flag

Narvik in action

By: Departmentofgoods.com Employee
March 5, 2009

Sorry about the watermark, but I'm too cheap to buy this photo. Cruisin' on a warm sunny day with the best softshell on the market.

Nailed It? (1) (0)

Flag Zoom

Is the outer hardshell material of this jacket very similar to

Is the outer hardshell material of this jacket very similar to the Arcteryx Stingray or more like Burton AK Contnuum(Soft Shell)? And does this have an alpinist cut(shorter in front/longer in back)? Zipper length? Looking for around 32".

Should I go L or XL?

195 lbs, 6'2", athletic, looking for a baggier fit.

Other jacket sizing comparisons:
Burton AK-L is pretty much the most perfect fit I have found in body/arm length and perfect baggyness/chest sizing.
Arcteryx Stingray-XL is closest but don't like the shorter front/longer back, and zipper of only 30" so yeah, too short.
North Face Sedition-XL is pretty good fit, just a touch big.

How does the fit compare, most specifically to the Burton AK?

Thank you.

By:
November 11, 2009

Nailed It? (0) (0)

Flag

Its the same material as the stingray.

By:
March 22, 2010

Nailed It? (0) (0)

Flag

the material is closer to the burton ak continuum, but it is gore, so its not exactly the same.

i love this shell. i have been in some gnarly storms in this thing and it has never let me down.

6'2" and 195, i would go XL, especially if you want it to be roomy.

By: Departmentofgoods.com Employee
November 14, 2009

Nailed It? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

very good jacket

By:
April 1, 2009

I bought size XL. Am 6'2" 210 lbs and it fits perfectly. My only complaint is that the hood is a tad small to fit over a helmet. Can be done but it is tight. Have used the jacket for skiing and snowboarding. perfect weight for a shell. looks good too.

Nailed It? (0) (0)

Flag

I noticed this jacket is very similar to the norrøna stranda

I noticed this jacket is very similar to the norrøna stranda jacket but its 100 dollar more expensive, what the difference in the jackets? you get anything more for the money?

By:
January 28, 2009

Nailed It? (0) (0)

Flag

They are two completely different jackets. The Narvik is a sofshell with no insulation, great for layering during activities that make you sweat. It is super breathable. The Stranda is an insulated jacket that is good for resort skiing, but will probably be too warm for any activity that is really going to get your sweat on.

By: Departmentofgoods.com Employee
February 20, 2009

Nailed It? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Move over Arc'Teryx

By: Departmentofgoods.com Employee
February 20, 2009

In my opinion Norrona has lain claim to the throne. I own two Norronas (the Lofoten Insulated jacket, and the Narvik), and I can't say enough about how amazing they are. This jacket is warm, waterproof, but incredibly breathable. I wear it for BC days (and resort days in the 30's with a Patagonia R1 underneath) and don't even have to open the pit-zips on the uphills, and it's bomber on the way down (great powder skirt, the most waterproof softshell I've ever seen). Quality construction, excellent fit (I am 6'2", 165lbs and wear the large), not too baggy, not too tight, great colors (***NOTE THAT THE "METAL" COLOR IS SLIGHTLY GRAYER THAN IT APPEARS ON THE SITE). The little things make the jacket: The hood is large enough for a helmet, but easily adjustable for just your head, the wrist gaiters are key for skiing, the diagonally cut wrist openings allow your thumbs to move around when you're got gloves on, the draw cords are easily pulled with one hand to adjust the fit...I could go on and on. It's expensive, but absolutely worth the money if you're looking for a jacket that is truly top of the line.

Nailed It? (2) (1)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: January 14, 2010 by:

By:
January 14, 2010

I agree, the jacket is awesome. Construction is tough and all the seams are immaculate. I can't say one bad thing about the jacket, it looks great, fits perfectly with tonnes of movement and there are just enough pockets, not overload like most jackets.

I would definitely suggest a fleecy under layer for colder days though as there is no insulation on this bad boy. Just pure element defense.

Flag

Nailed It? (0) (0)

Does the powder skirt of this jacket have hooks or other means

Does the powder skirt of this jacket have hooks or other means of attaching to pants that are not necessarily made by Norrona?ThanksNick

By:
January 11, 2009

Nailed It? (0) (0)

Flag

The powder skirt is attached to the coat via a smallish zipper that runs around the interior of the coat, but does not have hooks or anything. The zipper allows you to connect the coat to a pair of Norrona pants forming a pretty bomber snow blocking connection. You can completely remove the powder skirt from the coat if you desire as well. Could come in handy for Fall backpacking trips or something of that nature.

By: Departmentofgoods.com Employee
January 23, 2009

Nailed It? (0) (0)

Flag

Change me.

Tech Specs:

Material:
3L Gore-Tex Soft Shell 
Waterproof Rating:
Guaranteed waterproof 
Breathable Rating:
Guaranteed breathable 
Core Venting:
Mesh-lined chest vent zips 
Pockets:
[External] 2 Hand, 1 bicep; [Internal] 1 zippered 
Seam Taped:
Yes, fully 
Powder Skirt:
Yes, removable 
Hood:
Yes 
Zip-in Compatibility:
yes, with Norrøna pants 
Weight:
25oz (710g) 
Recommended Use:
Backcountry skiing, climbing, backpacking 
Manufacturer Warranty:
5 Years 
Country of Origin:
China 

You might also dig: